Rockoff looked at teacher mentoring in New York City, including the impact on student learning and teacher retention. The New Teacher Center worked with NYC to launch the mentoring program back in 2004. The city dismantled the program after 3 years -- not due to lack of positive impact -- but as part of its effort to devolve authority and decision-making from the central office to school principals.
Some key findings in Rockoff's paper include:
- Student achievement in both reading and math were higher among teachers that received more hours of mentoring, supporting the notion that time spent working with a mentor does improve teaching skills.
- Teacher retention within a particular school is higher when a mentor has previous experience working in that school.
- Strong relationships between measures of mentoring quality and teachers’ evaluations of the impact of mentors on their classroom success.
- Additional supports for new teachers (e.g., common planning time, professional development workshops, reduced teaching loads) beyond mentoring alone helps to increase retention, consistent with the research of Tom Smith and Richard Ingersoll (2004).
For those of you with a specific interest in teacher mentoring in New York City, a recent policy paper from the New Teacher Center (NTC) is also worth reading.
Also, here's what the NTC has to say about high-quality mentoring and induction practices and the cost effectiveness of investments in such programs.
You have read this article induction /
Jonah Rockoff /
mentoring /
New Teacher Center /
New York City /
teacher quality
with the title Does Mentoring Improve New Teachers?. You can bookmark this page URL https://apt3e.blogspot.com/2008/06/does-mentoring-improve-new-teachers.html. Thanks!
No comment for "Does Mentoring Improve New Teachers?"
Post a Comment