EPILOGUE (8/24/2010): Well, my predictions below didn't quite pan out. FL and RI came in strong, but IL and SC flopped (but
by mere points, of course). I was almost right that with two large states funded -- Florida and New York -- it would limit the number of winners. But the predicted nine became ten with the surprise inclusion of Hawaii (75 mil) among the winners, along with DC (also only 75 mil). For more on the winners, see
here.
---
Education Week (and its
Politics K-12 blog), the
Hechinger Report, the New America Foundation's
Ed Money Watch, and the
Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education have provided some excellent Race to the Top Phase 2 analysis.
Based on Phase 1 scores, reviews of Phase 2 applications, and other considerations, I believe
Florida,
Illinois,
Rhode Island and
South Carolina are locks for Phase 2 funding.
[UPDATE (8/4/2010): One thing that should be concerning to Georgia is an extremely low level of district buy-in (14%) to its application. The only two other states below 50% buy-in are California (18%) -- by design -- and Pennsylvania (32%). As a result I've moved Georgia from a 'lock' to a 'strong' contender.] Further, I think that
Colorado,
Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana,
Maryland,
Massachusetts, New York,
North Carolina,
Ohio and
Pennsylvania have strong chances at winning Phase 2 funding. (That would place the remaining finalists --
Arizona,
California,
District of Columbia,
Hawaii and
New Jersey -- outside the winners' circle.) That said,
which and
how many states will eventually be funded from the remaining pot of $3.4 billion is largely contingent upon the successes of the Big Three, each eligible to win $700 million:
Florida,
New York and
California. The presence of numerous $400 million eligible states in the mix also has the potential to limit the number of winners.
Let's look at a variety of scenarios, assuming in each case that Florida can bank on the $700 million. Of the three, I think New York has the next best shot at the dollars, with California's chances slightly less. In each case, I have listed the states in Phase One rank order (so feel free to replace any with your preference).
Scenario #1 (Florida only)TOTAL =
$3.375 billion 11 States|
STATE
Florida | MAX. AWARD
$700,000,000 | PHASE 1 RANK
4
|
| Georgia | $400,000,000 | 3 |
Illinois
So. Carolina
| $400,000,000
$175,000,000 | 5
6
|
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Kentucky
| $400,000,000
$75,000,000
$175,000,000 | 7
8
9
|
| Ohio | $400,000,000 | 10 |
| Louisiana | $175,000,000 | 11 |
No. Carolina
| $400,000,000 | 12 |
| DC | $75,000,000 | 16 |
Scenario #2 (Florida & New York)TOTAL =
$3.425 billion 9 States STATE
Florida | MAX. AWARD
$700,000,000 | PHASE 1 RANK
4
|
New York
Georgia | $700,000,000
$400,000,000 | 15
3 |
Illinois
So. Carolina
| $400,000,000
$175,000,000 | 5
6
|
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Kentucky
| $400,000,000
$75,000,000
$175,000,000 | 7
8
9
|
| Ohio | $400,000,000 | 10 |
Scenario #3 (Florida, New York & California)
TOTAL =
$3.325 billion 8 States|
STATE
Florida | MAX. AWARD
$700,000,000 | PHASE 1 RANK
4
|
New York
California
Georgia | $700,000,000
$700,000,000
$400,000,000 | 15
27
3 |
Illinois
So. Carolina
| $400,000,000
$175,000,000 | 5
6
|
Rhode Island
Kentucky
| $75,000,000
$175,000,000 | 8
9
|
DC
| $75,000,000
| 16
|
|
|
|
Scenario #4 (Max. Applicants w/ Florida)TOTAL = $3.4 billion 12 States STATE
Florida | MAX. AWARD
$700,000,000 | PHASE 1 RANK
4 |
| Georgia | $400,000,000 | 3 |
| Illinois | $400,000,000 | 5 |
So. Carolina
| $175,000,000 | 6 |
| Pennsylvania | $400,000,000 | 7 |
Rhode Island
| $75,000,000 | 8 |
| Kentucky | $175,000,000 | 9 |
| Ohio | $400,000,000 | 10 |
| Louisiana | $175,000,000 | 11 |
| Massachusetts | $250,000,000 | 13 |
| Colorado | $175,000,000 | 14 |
| DC | $75,000,000 | 16 |
Unless Florida somehow manages to fall on its face in Phase 2, I don't think it is realistic to envision more than
12 applicants receiving funding -- and that would require one of the $400 million-eligible states (such as North Carolina or Ohio) to be eclipsed and knocked out by a smaller state ranked lower in Phase 1 (such as Colorado, Massachusetts and/or the District of Columbia) or by Maryland, which did not apply in Phase 1 [see Scenario #4]. So although the U.S. Department of Education has dangled the possibility of as many as 15 Phase 2 winners, I don't see realistically how we can get there.
Related Posts:
You have read this article ARRA /
Race To The Top /
RttT /
U.S. Department of Education
with the title RttT. You can bookmark this page URL https://apt3e.blogspot.com/2010/07/race-to-top-analysis-spreading-wealth.html. Thanks!
Predictions that Florida Governor Charlie Crist's veto of a monstrosity of a teacher effectiveness bill back in April 2010 would cause his state to lose the Race to the Top competition have proven false.
